MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136574244 · doi:10.1190/1.3008547

f - x adaptive seismic-trace interpolation

2008· article· en· W2136574244 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsInterpolation (computer graphics)Seismic traceAlgorithmStairstep interpolationAdaptive filterTRACE (psycholinguistics)Filter (signal processing)Computer scienceBilinear interpolationInverse quadratic interpolationLinear interpolationMathematicsMultivariate interpolationApplied mathematicsPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceWaveletComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We use exponentially weighted recursive least squares to estimate adaptive prediction filters for frequency-space (f-x) seismic interpolation. Adaptive prediction filters can model signals where the dominant wavenumbers vary in space. This concept leads to an f-x interpolation method that does not require windowing strategies for optimal results. In other words, adaptive prediction filters can be used to interpolate waveforms that have spatially variant dips. The interpolation method's performance depends on two parameters: filter length and forgetting factor. We pay particular attention to selection of the forgetting factor because it controls the algorithm's adaptability to changes in local dip. Finally, we use synthetic- and real-data examples to illustrate the performance of the proposed adaptive f-x interpolation method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it