Nonlinear, multiple-input modeling of cerebral hemodynamics during baseline and hypercapnia in young and post-menopausal women
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Normal aging is associated with changes in the cardiovascular system and more specifically in cerebral circulation. Sex-dependent changes in cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity, which may be related to hormonal levels, have been also reported. We therefore examined cerebral hemodynamics, i.e., dynamic pressure autoregulation and CO2 reactivity, by employing beat-to-beat values of mean arterial blood pressure and middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity, as well as breath-to-breath values of end-tidal CO2 tension during baseline and sustained, end-tidal forcing induced hypercapnia in pre- and post-menopausal women. For this purpose, we employed a recently proposed nonlinear, multiple-input model of cerebral hemodynamics. The results suggest that dynamic autoregulation and reactivity in response to spontaneous fluctuations are not affected in postmenopausal women and that CO2 reactivity to the larger, experimentally-induced hypercapnic stimuli are affected mildly. A significant decrease in CO2 reactivity to spontaneous fluctuations was also observed during hypercapnia in all three groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it