Molecular Circadian Rhythms in Central and Peripheral Clocks in Mammals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The last decade has seen tremendous progress in our understanding of the organization and function of the circadian clock. A number of so-called clock genes were discovered, and these genes and their protein products were shown to organize into feedback loops to give a near 24 h rhythmicity. However, the mechanism is much more complicated. First, many new clock components have been identified, increasing both our understanding and the overall complexity of the mechanism. Second, there is now evidence that transcription may not play a central role in determining the functioning of the clock: the identification of post-translational modifications of the clock proteins has revealed new levels of control. Finally, chromatin remodeling seems to be crucial in the regulation of the expression of major clock components. This review describes the recent advances in our knowledge of the molecular clockwork in mammals; in particular, the contribution of new clock components and of post-transcriptional and post-translational events to circadian timekeeping are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it