Re-evaluating Event-Triggered and Time-Triggered Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Industrial control system design is increasingly adopting object oriented (OO) approaches. These approaches use an event-triggered communication model where communication is triggered by the occurrence of a significant event. Traditional low-level control systems for safety-critical applications use a different approach, namely time-triggered. The truth is that both event-triggered and time-triggered protocols have their advantages. Time-triggered protocols are dependable and event-triggered protocols are more responsive. Safety-critical systems demand dependability and as a result, time-triggered protocols have been used to date. Promising new findings indicate that an event-triggered protocol can be both responsive and dependable: a first in safety-critical control systems. This paper contrasts the two existing protocol paradigms and evaluation methodologies. A new protocol and new evaluation methodology are suggested that meet the stringent requirements of a safety-critical system. Initial findings are reported that indicate this to be a promising new direction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it