L’éducation des adultes chez les 16 à 18 ans
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comment expliquer l’utilisation quasi automatique des programmes de formation aux adultes par une majorité d’élèves de 16 à 18 ans vus comme étant des élèves handicapés ou en difficulté d’apprentissage ou d’adaptation (EHDAA) au secteur jeunes? Ce passage de l’école des jeunes à celle des adultes est-il lié à des aspirations professionnelles légitimes? Une étude de cas de type microtechnographique (Bogdan et Biklen, 1998) a permis de documenter les raisons qui motivent les jeunes de 16 à 18 ans ayant des difficultés à recourir à l’éducation des adultes 1 . Cette même étude a aussi permis de mieux comprendre l’expérience scolaire de ces jeunes, de même que les fondements derrière leur décision d’arrêter ou de poursuivre leur formation scolaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it