MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136905950 · doi:10.1002/aic.14899

Dissipativity‐based distributed model predictive control with low rate communication

2015· article· en· W2136905950 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIChE Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAustralian Research Council
KeywordsModel predictive controlDistillationStability (learning theory)Control theory (sociology)Control (management)Internal modelComputer scienceDistributed element modelTelecommunications networkInformation exchangeFractionating columnControl engineeringEngineeringChemistryTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed or networked model predictive control (MPC) can provide a computationally efficient approach that achieves high levels of performance for plantwide control, where the interactions between processes can be determined from the information exchanged among controllers. Distributed controllers may exchange information at a lower rate to reduce the communication burden. A dissipativity‐based analysis is developed to study the effects of low communication rates on plantwide control performance and stability. A distributed dissipativity‐based MPC design approach is also developed to guarantee the plantwide stability and minimum plantwide performance with low communication rates. These results are illustrated by a case study of a reactor‐distillation column network. © 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J , 61: 3288–3303, 2015

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it