On the efficiency and accuracy of hybrid pseudo-random number generators for FPGA-based simulations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most commonly-used pseudo-random number generators (PNGs) in computer systems are based on linear recurrence. These deterministic PNGs have fast and compact implementations, andean ensure very long periods. However, the points generated by linear PNGs in fact have a regular lattice structure and are thus not suit able for applications that rely on the assumption of uniformly distributed pseudo-random numbers (PNs). In this paper we propose and evaluate several fast and compact linear, non-linear, and hybrid PNGs for a field- programmable gate array (FPGA). The PNGs have excellent equidistribution properties and very small autocorrelations, and have very long repetition periods. The distribution and long-range correlation properties of the new generators are efficiently, and much more rapidly, estimated at hardware speeds using designed modules within the FPGA. The results of these statistical tests confirm that the combination of several linear PNGs or the combination of even one small non-linear PNG with a linear PNG significantly improves the statistical properties of the generated PNs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".