MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136972752 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2013.2267153

Development of a Flickermeter to Measure Non-Incandescent Lamps Flicker

2013· article· en· W2136972752 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlickerIncandescent light bulbEngineeringElectronic engineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The flickermeter described in International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) Standard 61000-4-15 is widely used to quantify the voltage flicker level in practical applications. The IEC flickermeter generally performs well for incandescent lamps. However, it fails to measure the flicker of non-incandescent lamps caused by some ranges of interharmonics. This paper suggests modifying the existing IEC flickermeter by adding a new block to it in order to enable accurate measurement of the flicker caused by high-frequency interharmonics. A digital implementation of the proposed modified flickermeter is tested, showing encouraging results. The error of the modified flickermeter is very low compared to the original one, even for the worst conditions. The changes implemented in the flickermeter do not affect its regular performance measuring incandescent lamp flicker due to amplitude modulation, making it a more generic flickermeter version. An arc furnace simulated by PSCAD/EMTDC is used to check the performance of this flickermeter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.430
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it