MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137009101 · doi:10.2113/gselements.7.6.387

Waste Streams of Mined Oil Sands: Characteristics and Remediation

2011· article· en· W2137009101 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueElements · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsDevon Energy (Canada)Natural Resources Canada
FundersNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsCitationTailingsOil sandsEnvironmental remediationIconMining engineeringSTREAMSEnvironmental scienceGeologyComputer scienceAsphaltArchaeologyWorld Wide WebGeographyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| December 01, 2011 Waste Streams of Mined Oil Sands: Characteristics and Remediation Kim L. Kasperski; Kim L. Kasperski 1Natural Resources Canada, Canmet ENERGY – Devon 1 Oil Patch Drive, Devon, AB T9G 1A8, CanadaE-mail: Kim.Kasperski@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Randy J. Mikula Randy J. Mikula 2Kalium Research12513, 39 avenue NW, Edmonton, AB T6J 0N1, CanadaE-mail: Randy.Mikula@gmail.com Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Elements (2011) 7 (6): 387–392. https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.7.6.387 Article history first online: 09 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Kim L. Kasperski, Randy J. Mikula; Waste Streams of Mined Oil Sands: Characteristics and Remediation. Elements 2011;; 7 (6): 387–392. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.7.6.387 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyElements Search Advanced Search Abstract The bitumen found in the oil sands of northern Alberta, Canada, represents a significant oil resource. This bitumen is extracted either from mined ore or by using in situ methods. The water-based extraction of mined ore creates large volumes of mineral suspensions that are stored in tailings ponds. Remediation of fine tailings has presented challenges. Several new treatment technologies promise to accelerate the remediation process and at the same time recover more water for use in the extraction process. As a world-class oil reserve, and the only commercially developed oil sand deposit, the Alberta oil sands represent an important future oil source, the magnitude of which will depend to some extent on our ability to limit environmental impacts. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score0.631

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it