MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137063334 · doi:10.1109/ssp.2005.1628769

Sensor network particle filters: motes as particles

2005· article· en· W2137063334 on OpenAlexaff
Mark Coates, G. Ing

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/SP 13th Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing, 2005 · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticle filterTransceiverTracking (education)Wireless sensor networkFilter (signal processing)Computer scienceVideo trackingCube (algebra)Object (grammar)Particle (ecology)Binary numberElectronic engineeringEngineeringComputer visionArtificial intelligenceComputer networkTelecommunicationsMathematicsWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe an algorithm for tracking an object using particle filtering in a sensor network comprised of smart dust-type motes. We investigate the situation where the motes are equipped with binary proximity sensors, low-power lasers and optical receivers for communication with nearby motes, and corner-cube arrays for communication with a central transceiver. The particle filter we describe is largely decentralized; a central transceiver performs no processing beyond a summation and weighted average. Individual motes act as the particles in that they represent candidate positions of the object. Propagation of the particle filter is performed through activation of appropriate neighbouring nodes with "weighted" messages. We provide simulation results of tracking a maneuvering object, comparing performance with a centralized particle filter

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE/SP 13th Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing, 2005Same topicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207