Data distribution and communication schemes for IQMR method on massively distributed memory computers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study the parallelization of the IQMR method for the solutions of linear systems of equations with unsymmetric coefficient matrices. The IQMR method is an improved version of the quasi-minimal residual (IQMR) method by using the Lanczos process as a major component combining elements of numerical stability and parallel algorithm design. The algorithm is derived such that all inner products and matrix-vector multiplications of a single iteration step are independent and communication time required for the inner product can be overlapped efficiently with computation time. Two important schemes are discussed. What is the best possible data distribution and which communication network topology is most suitable for the IQMR method on massively parallel distributed memory computers. A theoretical model of data distribution and communication phases is presented mainly based on (Hoekstra et al., 1991; 1992) which allows us to give a detailed execution time complexity analysis and investigates its usefulness. It is shown that the implementation of IQMR, with a row-block decomposition of the coefficient matrix, on a ring of communication structure is the most efficient choice. Performance tests of the developed parallel IQMR algorithm have been carried out on the massively distributed memory system and experimental timing results are compared with the theoretical execution time complexity analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it