MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137183867 · doi:10.1109/ivs.2004.1336492

Comparison between the unscented kalman filter and the extended kalman filter for the position estimation module of an integrated navigation information system

2004· article· en· W2137183867 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsKalman filterFast Kalman filterAlpha beta filterUnscented transformExtended Kalman filterInvariant extended Kalman filterComputer scienceEnsemble Kalman filterControl theory (sociology)Sensor fusionPosition (finance)Computer visionArtificial intelligenceMoving horizon estimation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An integrated navigation information system must know continuously the current position with a good precision. The required performance of the positioning module is achieved by using a cluster of heterogeneous sensors whose measurements are fused. The most popular data fusion method for positioning problems is the extended Kalman filter. The extended Kalman filter is a variation of the Kalman filter used to solve non-linear problems. Recently, an improvement to the extended Kalman filter has been proposed, the unscented Kalman filter. This paper describes an empirical analysis evaluating the performances of the unscented Kalman filter and comparing them with the extended Kalman filter's performances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.438
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations225
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInertial Sensor and NavigationFrench-language works237,207