MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137440488

Fast maximum a posteriori inference in Monte Carlo state spaces

2005· article· en· W2137440488 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsViterbi algorithmInferenceComputer scienceMaximum a posteriori estimationComputationMonte Carlo methodApproximate inferenceAlgorithmA priori and a posterioriRange (aeronautics)State (computer science)Artificial intelligenceHidden Markov modelMathematicsMaximum likelihoodStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many important algorithms for statistical inference can be expressed as a weighted maxkernel search problem.This is the case with the Viterbi algorithm for HMMs, message construction in maximum a posteriori BP (max-BP), as well as certain particlesmoothing algorithms.Previous work has focused on reducing the cost of this procedure in discrete regular grids [4].Monte-Carlo state spaces, which are vital for highdimensional inference, cannot be handled by these techniques.We present a novel dualtree based algorithm that is appliable to a wide range of kernels and shows substantial performance gains over nave computation.1 We note that there are techniques for dealing with KDE on Monte Carlo grids (fast Gauss Transform), but these are inapplicable in the max-kernel setting.2 By distance functions we mean functions that are similar to a metric but need not obey the triangle inequality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it