A novel distributed control protocol in dynamic wavelength-routed optical networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Path selection has long been one of the most important issues in the network design and management, which is also referred to as routing and wavelength assignment in the optical network domain. In this article we investigate the RWA problem for dynamic wavelength-routed mesh networks in a fully distributed controlled environment. We present a novel routing and signaling protocol called Asynchronous Criticality Avoidance (ACA), which is devised to reduce the mutual interference between lightpaths launched by different source-destination pairs to improve network performance in terms of blocking probability. With the fixed alternate routing architecture, the ACA protocol dynamically marks a set of wavelength channels as critical if the occupancy of the channels causes a bottleneck between an S-D pair with a width equal to or narrower than a predefined threshold. To support a distributed control environment, a suite of signaling processes is devised to realize the criticality avoidance mechanism, with which a two-stage routing and wavelength assignment (or criticality avoidance routing) is performed. The ACA protocol has been shown by simulations to be capable of better performance than existing schemes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it