Point-Based Rigid-Body Registration Using an Unscented Kalman Filter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present and validate a novel registration algorithm mapping two data sets, generated from a rigid object, in the presence of Gaussian noise. The proposed method is based on the Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) algorithm that is generally employed for analyzing nonlinear systems corrupted by additive Gaussian noise. First, we employ our proposed registration algorithm to fit two randomly generated data sets in the presence of isotropic Gaussian noise, when the corresponding points between the two data sets are assumed to be known. Then, we extend the registration method to the case where the data (with known correspondences) is stimulated by anisotropic Gaussian noise. The new registration method not only reliably converges to the correct registration solution, but it also estimates the variance, as a confidence measure, for each of the estimated registration transformation parameters. Furthermore, we employ the proposed registration algorithm for rigid-body, point-based registration where corresponding points between two registering data sets are unknown. The algorithm is tested on point data sets which are garnered from a pelvic cadaver and a scaphoid bone phantom by means of computed tomography (CT) and tracked free-hand ultrasound imaging. The collected 3-D points in the ultrasound frame are registered to the 3-D meshes in the CT frame by using the proposed and the standard Iterative Closest Points (ICP) registration algorithms. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method significantly outperforms the ICP registration algorithm in the presence of additive Gaussian noise. It is also shown that the proposed registration algorithm is more robust than the ICP registration algorithm in terms of outliers in data sets and initial misalignment between the two data sets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".