MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137693740 · doi:10.1109/nssmic.2006.356431

Kinetics of (R)-[11C] rolipram and (S)-[11C] rolipram In the Dog Heart: Investigation of Four Compartment Models

2006· article· en· W2137693740 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venue2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhosphodiesterase function and regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsRolipramCompartment (ship)KineticsPhosphodiesteraseChemistryPhysicsBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The PET tracers (R)-[ <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">11</sup> C]rolipram and (S)-[ <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">11</sup> C]rolipram have been proposed to measure phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) density as an indirect index of cAMP-mediated cell signaling, which is altered in many cardiac pathologies. The aim of this study was to determine which of the following models (if any) describe the kinetics of these tracers in normal dog hearts: a one-compartment model, a two-compartment model, and dual-input models comprising one or two compartments for rolipram and one compartment for labeled metabolites. Dynamic PET data were acquired from 6 healthy dogs with (R)-[ <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">11</sup> C]rolipram (10 studies) and (S)-[ <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">11</sup> C]rolipram (6 studies). Parameter estimates were obtained for 648 ROI's and median values determined. Distribution volumes were estimated from the parameter estimates. The one-compartment model did not fit the data acquired with either tracer adequately. Both the two-compartment model and the model comprising one compartment for the unchanged tracer and a parallel compartment to account for labeled metabolites provided good fits to the data obtained with (S)-[ <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">11</sup> C]rolipram (R-square: 0.99-1). The two-compartment model, with or without a parallel compartment to account for metabolites, described the kinetics of (R)-[ <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">11</sup> C]rolipram very well (R-square: 0.98-0.99). Estimates of the distribution volumes obtained with models that provided good fits to the data were very reproducible (CV: 10%-21%), suggesting that reliable measurement of PDE4 density in the heart may be possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.341
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it