MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Betraying the NHS: Health Abandoned

2008· article· en· W2137740247 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Services Management and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModernization theoryGovernment (linguistics)Health careIndependence (probability theory)Service (business)Public administrationPolitical scienceEconomicsPublic relationsBusinessLawMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Betraying the NHS: Health Abandoned by M. Mandelstam . Jessica Kingsley , London , 2006 , £14.99 (Hardback), 320 pp. ISBN 9781843104827 . The title correctly defines the evidence provided by Mandelstam on the current dismantling of the National Health Service (NHS). Although the author’s experience is mainly focused on his working area of Suffolk, there is plenty of bibliographical evidence provided in the text that demonstrates that New Labour is attempting to dismantle the NHS by privatizing the provision of its services and throwing it open to market forces. Mandelstam recognizes that the politically correct language of ‘choice’, ‘control’ and ‘independence’ achieved by central government pressurizes local councils into not providing services directly, but instead contracting them out to the private sector. Primary Care Trusts (PCT) that are planning to close hospitals claim that their proposals are about modernization and improvement, and not at root because of financial pressures. Another term that sounds good, until you look at the consequences for patients, is the obsession with targets, both clinical and financial. Mandelstam explains that targets and performance indicators paper over the cracks, declare false harvests and create a mirage of comprehensive, universal health service. The whole NHS has become in a sense disposable: its hundreds of hospitals and other organizations transformed into independent market actors must now increasingly fend for themselves financially. They are becoming answerable to market forces rather than to elected ministers. The increasing scope of Private Finance Initiative, and the financial burden it generates, means that this is perceived to be increasingly responsible for the size of the NHS debt, together with related bed closures and service cutbacks. The book provides horrific evidence of a lack of interest by the Department of Health (DoH) in the views of local people as well as a complete lack of accountability. The DoH refused to hand over 5500 letters and postcards and an 11 500-signature petition to West Suffolk PCT in the final decisions about closing Sudbury community hospitals. This episode quite reasonably led the author to conclude that we no longer have a ‘national NHS’, let alone one that proceeds on vaguely democratic lines. A main concern of the author is the loss of local services to elderly people. Dumping of services and patients onto local councils by the NHS does not work because Social Service authorities have no legal remit nor expertise to deliver health care and many of them are in serious financial difficulty. Patients are being increasingly treated like financial and business units, as NHS trusts endeavour at all costs – both financial and human – to meet targets and save money. Perhaps lessons can be learnt about how financial and political agendas, both rushed and covert, can undermine the effectiveness of NHS decision making. Somewhere, amid the welter of targets, indicators, new technology and hard processing of patients on conveyor belts (officially known as ‘care pathways’), what some would call old-fashioned ‘real care’ appears to have slipped from sight. This might appear not to matter; if it is old it must be bad. The problem is that so-called ‘old-fashioned’ real care actually works because it recognises people as individuals, rather than business units or financial bundles. This book is essential reading for staff and users of the NHS, in order to understand the constraints on the provision of an accountable publicly managed service and hopefully to alert readers of the need to keep our NHS public.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.079
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.409
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0790.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.506
GPT teacher head0.684
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it