MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138008252 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2008.4564587

EPON: An extensive review for up-to-date dynamic bandwidth allocation schemes

2008· article· en· W2138008252 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDynamic bandwidth allocationComputer scienceQuality of serviceBandwidth (computing)Bandwidth allocationComputer networkEthernetScheme (mathematics)Channel allocation schemesTelecommunicationsWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ethernet passive optical network (EPON) has been widely studied in literatures in the past few years. Researchers from all around the world are investigating EPON main challenges and dynamic bandwidth allocation (DBA) problems. This paper, reviews the most recent studies conducted in EPON networks and presents the new proposed DBA schemes. The reviewed schemes are classified according to the main challenge addressed by the investigator. A brief outline is given for each one along with a discussion of its performance and possible contribution to enhance EPON efficiency. Generally, the main purpose of this article is to review EPON problems and presents the up-to-date suggested solutions. Also to indicate that further studies need to be carried out if a single scheme that incorporates excellent bandwidth utilization with effective QoS support and guaranteed fairness is required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it