EFFECT OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR APPLICATION OF AN ANTIFOG SHRINK FILM TO MAINTAIN CAULIFLOWER QUALITY DURING STORAGE
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of an antifog shrinkfilm, as an overwrap, sealed bag, vacuum–sealed bag, or vacuum– and heat–sealed bag, to maintain the postharvest quality of cauliflower during storage. The antifog shrink film improved quality retention and cauliflower packaged using any of the four methods exhibited less weight loss than controls (unwrapped) after 23 days in storage at 0–1C or 10C. The overwrap and sealed bag treatments resulted in higher appearance ratings and less curd browning and butt discoloration after storage at 0–1C. Shrinking the film with heat and/or vacuum may have damaged the tissue, providing a more favorable environment for microorganism growth, since more decay was found on these curds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it