The Social Reconstruction of “Home” among African Immigrants in Canada
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many Africans migrating to new countries view this as a temporary economic move. Most hope to return to their homelands, after acquiring sufficient money and resources to live comfortably. However, for many African immigrants relocated in Canada, there is an “emotional reconstruction” of “home” as they begin to regard their adopted country as their permanent home. This deconstruction and reconstruction process involves very complex processes of emotional, cultural, economic, and social adjustment. This study of African immigrants in three Canadian cities—Montreal, Toronto and Winnipeg—demonstrates how they continue to maintain a strong attachment to their homelands, while struggling with adapting to their new country. Beaucoup d’Africains qui émigrent dans de nouveaux pays, pensent que ce n’est qu’un geste tem-poraire de caractère économique. La plupart espèrent revenir dans leur patrie, une fois acquis l’argent et les ressources qui leur permettront de vivre confortablement. Cependant, pour nombre d’émigrés africains relocalisés au Canada, une «reconstruction émotionnelle» d’un «chez soi» s’élabore au fur et à mesure que leur terre d’adoption devient pour eux un domicile permanent. Ce processus de déconstruction et de reconstruction comprend un mécanisme très complexe d’ajustement émotionnel, culturel, économique et social. L’étude ci-dessous d’émigrés africains dans trois villes canadiennes – Montréal, Toronto et Winnipeg – montre comment ils continuent à maintenir un lien fort avec leur pays d’origine, tout en luttant pour s’adapter à leur nouveau pays.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it