MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138486662 · doi:10.3138/flor.23.006

The Remarriage of Elite Widows in the Later Middle Ages

2006· article· en· W2138486662 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueFlorilegium · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHistorical Economic and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsDouglas College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEliteAristocracy (class)PrestigeRemarriagePoliticsPower (physics)Social statusCohabitationSociologyDemographyGender studiesDemographic economicsPolitical scienceEconomicsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although late medieval widows had considerable legal control over their own remarriages, in practice their freedom was limited by the constraints of family social strategies and, for the highly placed, by political manipulation by powerful men. Similar factors operated in many countries. The wealth and prestige which gave these women consequence also attracted men who wished to use those assets. This can be found at all levels of property and status, from widowed queens pressured by those seeking power, to widows on the margins of the aristocracy, who could be required to remarry to suit a patron. The freedom of widows to choose was almost always contingent on the greater social and political power of men. The article concludes with a case study of Maud Stanhope, Lady Willoughby.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.852
Threshold uncertainty score0.233

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it