Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article, l'auteur se penche sur la place de la confiance dans la gestion des ressources humaines (GRH) dans les petites entreprises (PE). Il cherche à répondre à deux interrogations complémentaires : En quoi la confiance est-elle susceptible de constituer un mode de GRH en PE, c'est-à-dire capable d’influer sur les attitudes des salariés à l’égard de l’entreprise ? Dans quelle mesure peut-elle être « gérée » (c’est-à-dire dynamisée) par le dirigeant ? Pour cela, il propose tout d’abord un cadre d’analyse de la confiance dans ce contexte. Puis, en se fondant sur les résultats d’une étude empirique menée auprès de 81 PE, il montre qu’il est possible pour un dirigeant de PE d’agir sur le sentiment de confiance mutuelle chez ses collaborateurs, et que ce sentiment influe sur l’implication organisationnelle de ceux-ci dans ses dimensions affective et normative.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".