MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138769772 · doi:10.2113/gselements.8.4.289

Granitic Pegmatites as Reflections of Their Sources

2012· article· en· W2138769772 on OpenAlexaffabout
P. Černý, David London, Miroslav Novák

Bibliographic record

VenueElements · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationCzechLibrary scienceHistoryArchaeologyPhilosophyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| August 01, 2012 Granitic Pegmatites as Reflections of Their Sources Petr Černý; Petr Černý 1Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, CanadaE-mail: p_cerny@umanitoba.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar David London; David London 2ConocoPhillips School of Geology & Geophysics, University of Oklahoma, 100 East Boyd Street, Room 710 SEC, Norman, OK 73019, USAE-mail: dlondon@ou.edu Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Milan Novák Milan Novák 3Department of Geological Sciences, Masaryk UniversityKotlářská 2, 611 37 Brno, Czech RepublicE-mail: mnovak@sci.muni.cz Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Petr Černý 1Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, CanadaE-mail: p_cerny@umanitoba.ca David London 2ConocoPhillips School of Geology & Geophysics, University of Oklahoma, 100 East Boyd Street, Room 710 SEC, Norman, OK 73019, USAE-mail: dlondon@ou.edu Milan Novák 3Department of Geological Sciences, Masaryk UniversityKotlářská 2, 611 37 Brno, Czech RepublicE-mail: mnovak@sci.muni.cz Publisher: Mineralogical Society of America First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1811-5217 Print ISSN: 1811-5209 © 2012 by the Mineralogical Society of America Elements (2012) 8 (4): 289–294. https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.8.4.289 Article history First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation Petr Černý, David London, Milan Novák; Granitic Pegmatites as Reflections of Their Sources. Elements 2012;; 8 (4): 289–294. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.8.4.289 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyElements Search Advanced Search Abstract Pegmatites accentuate the trace element signatures of their granitic sources. Through that signature, the origin of pegmatites can commonly be ascribed to granites whose own source characteristics are known and distinctive. Interactions with host rocks that might modify the composition of pegmatites are limited by the rapid cooling and low heat content of pegmatite-forming magmas. The trace element signatures of most pegmatites clearly align with those of S-type (sedimentary source, mostly postcollisional tectonic environment) and A-type (anorogenic environment, lower continental crust ± mantle source) granites. Pegmatites are not commonly associated with I-type (igneous source) granites. The distinction between granites that spawn pegmatites and those that do not appears to depend on the presence or absence, respectively, of fluxing components, such as B, P, and F, in addition to H2O, at the source. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations354
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElementsSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207