MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138773030 · doi:10.1109/tim.2005.858143

Partial Discharge Pattern Classification Using the Fuzzy Decision Tree Approach

2005· article· en· W2138773030 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPartial dischargeDecision treeFuzzy logicPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceClassifier (UML)Decision tree learningData miningFuzzy classificationComputer scienceFuzzy setMathematicsVoltageEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Partial discharge (PD) measurement is a proven flaw detection technique for finding cavities that are defects in the insulating material. In this paper, a novel approach for the classification of cavity sizes, based on their maximum PD charge transfer-applied voltage (/spl Delta/Q-V) characteristics using a fuzzy decision tree system, is proposed. The (/spl Delta/Q-V) partial discharge patterns for different cavity sizes are represented by features extracted from their pulse shapes, and the classification rules are directly extracted from the data using the decision tree. The decision rules obtained from the decision tree are then converted to the fuzzy IF-then rules, and the back-propagation algorithm is utilized to tune the parameters of the membership functions employed in the fuzzy classifier. The neuro-fuzzy classification technique is shown to provide successful classification of void sizes in an easily interpretive fashion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.626
Threshold uncertainty score0.438

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it