Gradient based iterative algorithms for solving a class of matrix equations
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Full frame distilled prediction
Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
- Candidate categories
- none
- Consensus categories
- none
- Domain
- Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
- Study design
- Candidate signal: Simulation or modelingConsensus signal: none
- Genre
- Candidate signal: MethodsConsensus signal: none
- Teacher disagreement score
- 0.844
- Threshold uncertainty score
- 0.748
- Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated·codex-gemma-dda1882f352a
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
In this note, we apply a hierarchical identification principle to study solving the Sylvester and Lyapunov matrix equations. In our approach, we regard the unknown matrix to be solved as system parameters to be identified, and present a gradient iterative algorithm for solving the equations by minimizing certain criterion functions. We prove that the iterative solution consistently converges to the true solution for any initial value, and illustrate that the rate of convergence of the iterative solution can be enhanced by choosing the convergence factor (or step-size) appropriately. Furthermore, the iterative method is extended to solve general linear matrix equations. The algorithms proposed require less storage capacity than the existing numerical ones. Finally, the algorithms are tested on computer and the results verify the theoretical findings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
- Topic
- Matrix Theory and Algorithms
- Field
- Computer Science
- Canadian institutions
- University of Alberta
- Funders
- not available
- Keywords
- Iterative methodSylvester matrixMatrix (chemical analysis)MathematicsAlgorithmConvergence (economics)Rate of convergenceMatrix-free methodsMatrix splittingConvergent matrixMathematical optimizationApplied mathematicsLocal convergenceComputer scienceSparse matrixState-transition matrixSymmetric matrixMathematical analysis
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes