MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139142356 · doi:10.1164/rccm.201408-1564oc

Eight Hours of Nightly Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Improves Glucose Metabolism in Patients with Prediabetes. A Randomized Controlled Trial

2015· article· en· W2139142356 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Center for Research ResourcesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteDiabetes Research and Training CenterGeorgia Clinical and Translational Science AllianceNational Institute on AgingNational Institutes of HealthUniversity of Chicago
KeywordsMedicineContinuous positive airway pressureInsulinPrediabetesInternal medicineRandomized controlled trialObstructive sleep apneaAnesthesiaBlood pressureDiabetes mellitusInsulin resistanceSleep apneaConfidence intervalPlaceboEndocrinologyType 2 diabetes

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RATIONALE: Although obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes, it remains unclear whether OSA treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has metabolic benefits. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of 8-hour nightly CPAP treatment on glucose metabolism in individuals with prediabetes and OSA. METHODS: In a randomized controlled parallel group study, 39 participants were randomly assigned to receive either 8-hour nightly CPAP (n = 26) or oral placebo (n = 13). Sleep was polysomnographically recorded in the laboratory on each night. CPAP adherence was ensured by continuous supervision. Participants continued their daily routine activities outside the laboratory. Glucose metabolism was assessed at baseline and after 2 weeks of assigned treatment using both the oral and intravenous glucose tolerance tests. The primary outcome was the overall glucose response as quantified by the area under the curve for glucose during 2-hour oral glucose tolerance testing. Secondary outcomes included fasting and 2-hour glucose and insulin, the area under the curves for insulin and insulin secretion, norepinephrine, insulin sensitivity, acute insulin response to glucose, and 24-hour blood pressure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The overall glucose response was reduced (treatment difference: -1,276.9 [mg/dl] · min [95% confidence interval, -2,392.4 to -161.5]; P = 0.03) and insulin sensitivity was improved (treatment difference: 0.77 [mU/L](-1) · min(-1) [95% confidence interval, 0.03-1.52]; P = 0.04) with CPAP as compared with placebo. Additionally, norepinephrine levels and 24-hour blood pressure were reduced with CPAP as compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with prediabetes, 8-hour nightly CPAP treatment for 2 weeks improves glucose metabolism compared with placebo. Thus, CPAP treatment may be beneficial for metabolic risk reduction. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01156116).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it