MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139353402 · doi:10.1109/icip.1997.647396

MPEG4 face modeling using fiducial points

2002· article· en· W2139353402 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace recognition and analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFiducial markerComputer scienceComputer visionArtificial intelligenceFace (sociological concept)Computer facial animationFacial expressionAnimationActive appearance modelCoding (social sciences)Facial motion captureFacial recognition systemComputer graphics (images)Image (mathematics)Computer animationFace detectionFeature extractionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an approach for modeling a person's face for model-based coding (MPEG4) which will cater to very low bit-rate video-conferencing applications. This approach is performed entirely automatically. We utilize two views of a person's face, and the fiducial points defined on a generic facial model, to modify the generic model into a 3D individual model of a face. To deform the generated individual facial model for tracking the expression of a face over time, a new method named the layered force spreading method (LFSM) is proposed which makes the animation of facial expressions looks more natural. The feasibility of our approach is demonstrated using a real facial image.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.721

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFace recognition and analysisFrench-language works237,207