MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139551838

On the influence of the material properties of the external ear on occlusion effect simulations

2012· article· en· W2139551838 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Martin Brummund, Franck Sgard, Yvan Petit, Frédéric Laville

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersInstitut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail
KeywordsPoisson's ratioCadaverBiomedical engineeringMaterial propertiesModulusMaterials scienceFractional factorial designPoisson distributionSoft tissueAnatomyHead (geology)Factorial experimentMathematicsComposite materialMedicineStatisticsGeologySurgery
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A two-level fractional factorial design was implemented to examine how the material properties of the external ear tissues influence numerical predictions of the occlusion effect (OE). A simplified 2D model was developed and successfully compared to an equivalent 3D model whose complex external ear geometry was reconstructed using 135 anatomical images of a female cadaver head. Outer circumferential boundaries of the skin and cartilage domains are fixed. Analysis of variance indicates significant single factor effects for skin, soft, and bony tissues. Skin, soft, and bony material properties are found to contribute significantly to simulated OEs. Mostly Poisson's ratio and Young's modulus of the skin tissue tend to exhibit effect estimates which are large enough to cause relevant variations in simulated OE data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicReconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207