Pitch plane analysis of a twin-gas-chamber strut suspension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A twin-gas-chamber hydropneumatic suspension strut concept is proposed to achieve enhanced bounce and pitch ride, and pitch attitude control. The response characteristics of the twin-gas-chamber strut suspension are compared with those of a single-gas-chamber strut suspension to demonstrate not only superior performance potentials but also the added design flexibility offered by the twin-gas-chamber struts. The relative responses of both strut suspensions are evaluated through analysis of a pitch plane vehicle model, subject to straight-line braking inputs and excitations arising from randomly distributed road elevations. A generalized formulation for the strut forces is presented to derive the bounce and pitch rates of the proposed strut suspensions. The results reveal that the twin-gas-chamber strut suspension exhibits a slightly lower pitch stiffness in the vicinity of design ride height, but progressively hardening effects with increasing pitch deflections. Moreover, the twin-gas-chamber strut suspension exhibits considerably fewer hardening—softening effects in suspension rate compared with the suspension involving the single-gas-chamber struts. The results attained from the parametric studies are also discussed to demonstrate superior design flexibility of the twin-gas-chamber struts for tuning of the suspension bounce and pitch stiffness properties. The dynamic responses of the vehicle model with different suspensions are assessed subject to random road roughness excitations as well as braking torque inputs. The results demonstrate that the twin-gas-chamber strut suspension offers considerable potential for enhancing bounce and pitch ride, pitch attitude control, and suspension travel responses under braking, while the influence on the ride and road-holding responses under random road inputs is insignificant. The results also suggest that a relatively soft front suspension design could provide further enhancement of pitch ride and pitch deflection responses under random road roughness excitations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".