MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139596645 · doi:10.1109/tc.2007.13

Low-Weight Polynomial Form Integers for Efficient Modular Multiplication

2007· article· en· W2139596645 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModular arithmeticMathematicsModuliElliptic curveMersenne primeInteger (computer science)PolynomialPrime (order theory)Discrete mathematicsFinite fieldMultiplication (music)ArithmeticCryptosystemCryptographyCombinatoricsPure mathematicsComputer scienceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1999, Jerome Solinas introduced families of moduli called the generalized Mersenne numbers (GMNs), which are expressed in low-weight polynomial form, p = f(t), where t is limited to a power of 2. GMNs are very useful in elliptic curve cryptosystems over prime fields, since only integer additions and subtractions are required in modular reductions. However, since there are not many GMNs and each GMN requires a dedicated implementation, GMNs are hardly useful for other cryptosystems. Here we modify GMN by removing restriction on the choice of t and restricting the coefficients of f(t) to 0 and ±1. We call such families of moduli low-weight polynomial form integers (LWPFIs). We show an efficient modular multiplication method using LWPFI moduli. LWPFIs allow general implementation and there exist many LWPFI moduli. One may consider LWPFIs as a trade-off between general integers and GMNs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.777
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryptography and Residue ArithmeticFrench-language works237,207