MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139652227 · doi:10.1109/rfic.2008.4561519

60 GHz transmitter circuits in 65nm CMOS

2008· article· en· W2139652227 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDefense Advanced Research Projects AgencyUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsCMOSTransmitterAmplifierElectrical engineeringGain compressionElectronic circuitRadio frequencydBmPower (physics)Electronic engineeringMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsTelecommunicationsEngineeringPhysicsChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents fundamental building blocks for a 60 GHz transmitter front-end. The circuits are implemented in a 65 nm bulk CMOS technology, operate from a 1.2 V supply, and attain state-of-the-art performance for multi-Gb/s wireless applications. A single-stage, single-ended, power amplifier achieves peak power gain of 4.5 dB, output 1 dB compression point of 6 dBm, saturated power of 9 dBm, and peak power added efficiency of 8.5% at 62 GHz. A double-balanced, Gilbert-based, up-conversion mixer achieves 6.5 dB of conversion loss and output 1 dB compression point of -5.0 dBm with LO of 50 GHz and IF of 10 GHz. Millimeter-wave design considerations and measurements over frequency and temperature are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.476
Threshold uncertainty score0.837

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207