MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139656913 · doi:10.1109/tsp.2009.2022915

Optimal Threshold Policies for Multivariate POMDPs in Radar Resource Management

2009· article· en· W2139656913 on OpenAlexaff
Vikram Krishnamurthy, D.V. Djonin

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultilinear mapParameterized complexityMarkov decision processComputer scienceMathematical optimizationScheduling (production processes)Multivariate statisticsMarkov processRadarMarkov chainAlgorithmMathematicsMachine learningStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with the management of multimode sensors such as multifunction radars. We consider the problems of multitarget radar scheduling formulated as multivariate partially observed Markov decision process (POMDPs). The aim is to compute the scheduling policy to determine which target to choose and how long to continue with this choice so as to minimize a cost function. We give sufficient conditions on the cost function, dynamics of the Markov chain target and observation probabilities so that the optimal scheduling policy has a threshold structure with respect to the multivariate TP2 ordering. This implies that the optimal parameterized policy can be estimated efficiently. We then present stochastic approximation algorithms for estimating the best multilinear threshold policy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Signal ProcessingSame topicDistributed Sensor Networks and Detection AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207