MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139707829 · doi:10.1258/096914107782066202

Assessing the impact of screening and counselling high school children for <i>β</i>-thalassaemia in India

2007· letter· en· W2139707829 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Screening · 2007
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGenetic counselingPediatricsFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

b-Thalassaemia is the commonest single gene disorder in India. It has been estimated that around 10,000–12,000 children with b-thalassaemia major are born each year. 1 A programme for education, screening and genetic counselling of high school students was undertaken between 1984 and 1988. In total, 5682 school children (age – 11–18 years) from 75 schools in Mumbai city were screened after obtaining informed consent from their parents. Of the 5682 children, 153 (prevalence 2.7%) were found to be b-thalassaemia heterozygotes. A few carriers of haemoglobin (Hb) S, Hb D, Hb E, db thalassaemia and Hereditary Persistance of Fetal Haemoglobin (o1.0%) were also identified. 2 Screening and counselling family members (parents and other siblings) had been possible in 71 of the 153 children who were carriers of b-thalassaemia. All of them were given report cards as well as a booklet giving information on thalassaemia. After a gap of 20 years, an attempt was made to follow-up these 71 families to evaluate the impact of screening this group. The results are reported here. Letters were first sent asking the families to attend a follow-up clinic, but the response was very poor. Home visits were then made by a medical social worker and a well-designed proforma was used to gather information on the outcome of screening. Specific questions were asked to evaluate whether they remembered having been tested in school and were aware of their carrier status, how many of them had arranged for their partners to be tested before marriage or their spouses tested after marriage and if any thalassaemia major children were born. Forty-seven of the 71 families could be contacted. Eighteen families had moved residence and in six cases the addresses given were incorrect. The students screened were now in the age group of 30–38 years. The response of the individuals screened and/or their parents is summarized in Table 1. Only 12 of the 47 individuals contacted (26%) recollected that they were b-thalassaemia carriers. The others vaguely remembered that some blood test was carried out in school but had lost their reports. None of the 41 individuals who were now married had revealed their carrier status or had their partners tested before marriage. However, 11 individuals had had their spouses tested for haemoglobinopathies after marriage. Thirty-four of these couples had children but only four families had had their children screened. A thalassaemia major child was born in one family in spite of screening. Screening for b-thalassaemia and other haemoglobinopathies is a prerequisite for a community control programme. In India, both retrospective and prospective screening had been carried out in different target groups. 3–5 However, the long-term impact of screening has never been evaluated. This has immense relevance as a lot of time, effort and money goes into such programmes. A similar programme on screening over 25,000 high school students, in Montreal, Canada showed that virtually all the carriers identified in the high

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.509
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it