MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139850286 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2009.2039814

Cross-Layer Scheduling for OFDMA Amplify-and-Forward Relay Networks

2010· article· en· W2139850286 on OpenAlexaff
Derrick Wing Kwan Ng, Robert Schober

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGoodputComputer scienceChannel state informationSubcarrierTelecommunications linkRelayScheduling (production processes)Orthogonal frequency-division multiple accessDiversity gainFadingOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingFrequency-division multiple accessPhysical layerComputer networkChannel (broadcasting)WirelessMathematical optimizationThroughputPower (physics)TelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we consider cross-layer scheduling for the downlink of amplify-and-forward (AF) relay-assisted orthogonal frequency-division multiple-access (OFDMA) networks. The proposed cross-layer design takes into account the effects of imperfect channel-state information (CSI) at the transmitter (CSIT) in slow fading. The rate, power, and subcarrier allocation policies are optimized to maximize the system goodput (in bits per second per hertz successfully received by the users). The optimization problem is solved by using dual decomposition, resulting in a highly scalable distributed iterative resource-allocation algorithm. We also investigate the asymptotic performance of the proposed scheduler with respect to (w.r.t.) the numbers of users and relays. We find that the number of relays should grow faster than the number of users to fully exploit themultiuser diversity(MUD) gain. On the other hand, diversity from multiple relays can be exploited to enhance system performance when the MUD gain is saturated due to noise amplification at the AF relays. Furthermore, we introduce a feedback-reduction scheme to reduce the computational burden and the required amount of CSI feedback from the users to the relays. Simulation results confirm the derived analytical results for the growth of the system goodput and illustrate that the proposed distributed cross-layer scheduler only requires a small number of iterations to achieve practically the same performance as the optimal centralized scheduler, even if the information exchanged between the base station (BS) and the relays in each iteration is quantized, and the proposed CSI feedback reduction scheme is employed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations103
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207