MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139924822 · doi:10.2110/jsr.2008.067

Geochemical Identification of Clastic Sediment Provenance from Known Sources of Similar Geology: The Cretaceous Scotian Basin, Canada

2008· article· en· W2139924822 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sedimentary Research · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of OceanographyGeological Survey of CanadaSaint Mary's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProvenanceGeologyCretaceousClastic rockStructural basinSedimentGeochemistryPaleontologyGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study tests the effectiveness of a geochemical approach in identifying provenance in a basin where different sources do not show strongly contrasting geology. Petrological studies indicate that at least three distinct rivers, draining reactivated horsts of the Appalachian orogen, supplied sediment to the Lower Cretaceous deltaic sandstones and mudrocks in the offshore Scotian Basin. Ninety-five samples mostly from conventional core were analyzed for 44 major and trace elements. The data were first screened for variability unrelated to provenance, including changes in elemental abundance due to weathering and diagenesis, and the effects of grain size and sorting on element variation. The effect of hydraulic sorting was distinguished from the effects of concentration of ultrastable heavy minerals from polycyclic sources. Multivariate statistical analysis by principal-component analysis (PCA) was used to test the hypothesis of three discrete sources suggested by the petrologic model. Major-element PCA on sandstones discriminated the sources, but results from trace-element PCA required further investigation using element biplots to understand their significance. Only a few elements were found to be diagnostic of different sources, namely K, Rb, Sr, U, Th, Nb, and Ti, with the latter two of value only for sandstones. All of these are elements that are abundant in the granites of the Appalachians. Most published geochemical discrimination diagrams did a poor job of distinguishing the three petrographically recognized sources. In other basins with quite different hinterland geology, other elements are known to be of value in discriminating provenance. Thus it is unlikely that a globally applicable set of elemental discriminants can identify terrigenous sediment sources. Rather, systematic investigation is needed that evaluates processes such as diagenesis and sorting and then tests geographic and stratigraphic variability in bulk geochemistry, informed by at least semiquantitative petrographic data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.276
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it