Pourquoi des hérauts d'armes ? Les raisons d'une institution
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Le point de départ de cet article est la constatation que les hérauts n’ont eu d’importance qu’au cours de la période – du xiii e au xvi e siècle – durant laquelle les cours princières furent un moyen essentiel de la médiatisation de l’aristocratie. Durant cette phase, les princes eurent besoin d’une instance qui fît le lien entre les revendications de leur pouvoir et la liberté de la noblesse. Les hérauts constituèrent cette instance. Ils symbolisaient cette structure double en servant tout autant un maître noble que le bien commun, en paix comme en guerre, comme messagers et comme organisateurs des tournois et des duels, par le cérémonial comme par les lettres. Ils étaient, au sens traditionnel, les avocats de l’honneur noble autant que de modernes technocrates de l’appareil gouvernemental des princes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it