MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139992508 · doi:10.1144/1467-7873/04-204

High thallium content in rocks associated with Au–As–Hg–Tl and coal mineralization and its adverse environmental potential in SW Guizhou, China

2004· article· en· W2139992508 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochemistry Exploration Environment Analysis · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicThallium and Germanium Studies
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of CanadaUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThalliumMineralization (soil science)ChinaCoalEnvironmental chemistryGeochemistryEnvironmental scienceChemistryGeologyMineralogySoil scienceGeographyInorganic chemistryArchaeologySoil water

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Very few investigations have dealt with the environmental impact of the highly toxic metal thallium (Tl), and its subsequent dispersion through natural processes and human activities such as mining and farming. This study is focused on high concentrations of Tl in rocks in SW Guizhou, China, that are related to several widely scattered disseminated gold–mercury–arsenic and coal deposits, and a primary Tl deposit within an Au–As–Hg–Tl metallogenic belt of the Huijiabao anticline. The Tl, Hg and As in the Lanmuchang Hg–Tl deposit area are associated with the abundant occurrence of sulfide minerals such as lorandite, realgar, orpiment and cinnabar. Concentrations of Tl range from 100 to 35 000 ppm in sulfide ores, and 39–490 ppm in host rocks. The enrichment of Au, Tl, Hg, As, and Sb in the Yanshang gold mineralized area reflects the occurrence of Au mineralization and its mineral assemblage of Tl–Hg–As–Sb sulfides. Thallium ranges from 0.22 to 16 ppm in Au ores and host rocks. Thallium in coals is enriched up to 46 ppm within the Au–As–Hg–Tl metallogenic belt, and is derived from the regional Au–As–Hg–Tl mineralization. Mercury and As show a similar distribution to Tl with high concentrations in sulfide ores, coals and host rocks. Human populations living near and downstream of Tl deposits and Tl-bearing ore deposits are susceptible to Tl contamination because of its high toxicity and high uptake rate by crops. The dispersion of Tl, Hg and As associated with the primary mineralization of Au–As–Hg–Tl can be traced through physical erosion and chemical weathering, producing secondary dispersion into soils, groundwater and surface water and crops. Mining activities compound the natural processes, readily dispersing Tl into the surface environment. The Lanmuchang area illustrates Tl contamination related to a Tl-rich deposit due to both natural processes and the impact of mining. The Yanshang area demonstrates Tl contamination related toa Tl-bearing gold deposit, caused by natural processes in the absence of mining activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.381
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it