MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140468868 · doi:10.1061/9780784412848.105

Investigation of the Post-Cracking Dynamic Behavior of Masonry Structures Retrofitted with CFRP

2013· article· en· W2140468868 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructures Congress 2013 · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMasonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Canadian institutionsCanadian Natural ResourcesUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMasonryUnreinforced masonry buildingRetrofittingCrackingStructural engineeringBrittlenessMasonry veneerFibre-reinforced plasticDuctility (Earth science)Materials scienceGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringComposite materialCreep

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unreinforced masonry buildings have shown to be prone to seismic forces due to their brittle behavior. Therefore, many experimental and analytical studies have been conducted on different retrofitting methods, including the use of Fiber Reinforced Polymers (FRP,) to improve the lateral strength and ductility of these structures. Time history dynamic analyses were conducted on an uncracked and cracked one story unreinforced masonry structure with window and door openings. Based on the analytical results, the effect of cracks and openings on the seismic response of the structure was investigated. Thereafter, the building was retrofitted with FRP strips to improve the post cracking behavior. It was found that masonry cracking increases the damping of the masonry structure. However, the integrity of the structure must be maintained to prevent total collapse, thus satisfying the life safety requirements of the occupants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it