MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140478491 · doi:10.2113/gsecongeo.105.3.689

Diamonds through Time

2010· article· en· W2140478491 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomic Geology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyCratonGeochemistryEclogitePeridotiteMantle (geology)SubductionKimberliteMetasomatismAsthenosphereLithosphereArcheanDiamondPetrologyPaleontologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diamonds form in the upper mantle during episodic events and have been transported to the Earth’s surface from at least the Archean to the Phanerozoic. Small diamonds occur as inclusions in robust minerals in tectonically activated, ultrahigh-pressure metamorphosed crustal rock, establishing an association with subduction processes and recycled carbon, but providing no economic deposits. Diamonds in economic deposits are estimated to be mainly (99%) derived from subcontinental lithospheric mantle and rarely (approx. 1%) from the asthenosphere. Harzburgite and eclogite are of roughly equal importance as source rocks, followed by lherzolite and websterite. Diamonds which provide evidence of extensive residence time in the mantle are, with minimal exceptions, smooth-surfaced crystalline diamonds (SCD) with potential commercial value. The oldest prolific SCD formation event documented on the world’s major diamond producing cratons occurs in Archean lithospheric mantle harzburgite, metasomatized by likely subduction-related potassic carbonatitic fluids. Disaggregation of the diamondiferous carbonated peridotite on decompression during volcanic transit gives rise to the association between diamonds, G10 garnets, and diamond inclusion-type chromites, well used in diamond exploration. Within the mantle domains of diamond stability, there have been repeated episodes of further diamond crystallization and/or growth. These are associated with old, often Proterozoic, subduction-related melt generation, metasomatic fluid migration, and reaction with preexisting mantle eclogite, websterite, and peridotite. Using improved methods of isotope analysis, diamond formation ages can be correlated with specific major processes such as craton accretion, craton edge subduction, and magmatic mantle refertilization. Fibrous cuboid diamond and fibrous coats on SCD are rough-surfaced diamonds with abundant fluid inclusions. They have low mantle residence time, forming rapidly from late stage metasomatic fluids in diamond stable domains that may already contain SCD. The symbiotic relationship between formation of fibrous diamond and magmatic sampling and transport of diamonds into the crust suggest that the associated fluids contribute diamond-friendly volatile loading of the deep lithospheric mantle shortly before the triggering of a volcanic eruption, continuing a process of volatile enrichment in the lithospheric mantle already identified in the Archean harzburgite diamond event. Mantle-derived SCD commonly shows evidence of resorption, illustrating that diamond-unfriendly processes, including lamproite and kimberlite generation, are also active and may have a substantial negative effect in extreme cases on SCD crystal size. Exposure of SCD to a long period of changing conditions during mantle residence contributes to the difficulty of assigning specific parageneses and ages to individual inclusion-free diamonds with our current state of knowledge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score0.966

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3040.035

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it