MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140480013 · doi:10.1109/anss-41.2008.9

Towards Peer-to-Peer Based Distributed Simulations on a Grid Infrastructure

2008· article· en· W2140480013 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings - Simulation Symposium/Proceedings of the ... annual Simulation Symposium · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistributed computingComputer scienceScalabilityHigh-level architectureInteroperabilityGridGrid computingFlexibility (engineering)ArchitectureDistributed Interactive SimulationPeer-to-peerService-oriented architectureReusabilityWeb serviceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Grid based distributed simulations are becoming more and more important with the increasing number of large-scale modeling and simulation applications. Distributed simulations are evolving with modern distributed computing techniques and are facing new challenges such as interoperability, reusability, scalability, etc. distributed interactive simulation and high level architecture have been the dominant distributed simulation standards for the past few years, and HLA is still the backbone for supporting federate based distributed simulations. However, HLA relies heavily on centralized runtime infrastructure (RTI) and is not easy to scale for large-scale applications. Also, its interoperability is limited since it does not use a fully opened standard such as service oriented architecture (SOA). Therefore, a lot research has been done to promote the next generation of simulation architecture. Such efforts result in the XMSF, which tries to integrate SOA with distributed simulation. In the meantime, peer-to-peer network based distributed simulations are also attracting more researchers to investigate the feasibility of decentralized architecture for large-scale distributed simulations. In this paper, we propose a hierarchical service oriented JXIA-core multi-layered architecture for large scale distributed simulations. Our particular design consideration is dynamic reconfigurable and realtime capable distributed simulation infrastructure, and we also aim to address most of the concerns regarding grid based large-scale distributed simulation. We further verify our design through a formal DEVS simulation based modeling. We believe that a decentralized framework will be dominant in the area of distributed simulations in the near future due to its flexibility, scalability, and the ease of reconfiguring simulation applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.198
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it