MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140600915 · doi:10.2174/157339905774574301

Role of Insulin in Glucose-Stimulated Insulin Secretion in Beta Cells

2005· review· en· W2140600915 on OpenAlexaff
H. Joseph Goren

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Diabetes Reviews · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInsulinInternal medicineEndocrinologyInsulin oscillationInsulin resistanceDiabetes mellitusType 2 diabetesMedicineInsulin receptorBeta cellBiologyIslet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diabetes is on the increase worldwide and greater than 90% are type 2. There are two features to type 2 diabetes: muscle, fat and liver tissues are insulin resistant and beta cells lose the ability to secrete insulin. Prior to developing diabetes, however, insulin resistant individuals lose the first-phase insulin secretion response. Transgenic mice lacking insulin receptors in their beta cells have no first-phase response. Primary cultures of mouse islets pre-exposed to anti-insulin do not exhibit a first-phase insulin secretion response. That is, beta cells, like muscle, fat, and liver, are an insulin sensitive tissue and in the presence of insulin resistance (type 2 diabetes), in the absence of insulin receptors (transgenic mice lacking beta cell insulin receptors), or in the absence of constitutively secreted insulin (anti-insulin treatment), beta cells are unable to respond properly to post-prandial glucose. The purpose of this report is to review our understanding of the glucose-stimulus response and of insulin signaling, and to suggest why the latter may be necessary for the former to proceed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Diabetes ReviewsSame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207