Single-Ended Speech Quality Measurement Using Machine Learning Methods
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We describe a novel single-ended algorithm constructed from models of speech signals, including clean and degraded speech, and speech corrupted by multiplicative noise and temporal discontinuities. Machine learning methods are used to design the models, including Gaussian mixture models, support vector machines, and random forest classifiers. Estimates of the subjective mean opinion score (MOS) generated by the models are combined using hard or soft decisions generated by a classifier which has learned to match the input signal with the models. Test results show the algorithm outperforming ITU-T P.563, the current "state-of-art" standard single-ended algorithm. Employed in a distributed double-ended measurement configuration, the proposed algorithm is found to be more effective than P.563 in assessing the quality of noise reduction systems and can provide a functionality not available with P.862 PESQ, the current double-ended standard algorithm
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it