MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fuente AC programable basada en convertidor multinivel asimétrico en cascada para la reproducción controlada de fenómenos de calidad de energía eléctrica

2014· article· en· W2140696504 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yogesh C. Bangar, Tawseef Khan, Amit Kumar Dohare, D. V. Kolekar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Buffalo Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLivestock Management and Performance Improvement
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDivision (mathematics)Veterinary medicineDemographyBiologyGeographyMedicineMathematicsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La creciente integración de generación distribuida, convertidores electrónicos y cargas no lineales ha incrementado la presencia de fenómenos de calidad de energía en los sistemas eléctricos. Su estudio experimental requiere plataformas capaces de reproducir eventos bajo condiciones controladas, debido a que los registros de campo no siempre permiten imponer magnitud, duración y frecuencia definidas. Desarrollar y validar una fuente basada en convertidor multinivel para la reproducción de fenómenos de calidad de energía en laboratorio. La propuesta se implementó sobre un convertidor multinivel asimétrico y combinó un modelo analítico basado en series de Fourier con un algoritmo de optimización para obtener los estados y tiempos de conmutación requeridos. La validación se realizó mediante simulación en Matlab/Simulink y pruebas experimentales sobre una condición base de 110 V RMS a 60 Hz. La plataforma permitió reproducir de forma controlada depresión de tensión, elevación de tensión, interrupción y variación de frecuencia. En los fenómenos definidos por variación de tensión eficaz, las mediciones experimentales presentaron errores porcentuales entre 0.09 % y 3 % respecto a los valores programados. Para la frecuencia, se verificó la generación de escenarios a 58 Hz y 62 Hz, por fuera del rango nominal. La plataforma reproduce de forma controlada los cuatro fenómenos evaluados con errores en V_RMS no superiores al 3 % y un THDv experimental del 2 %, cumpliendo el límite del 5 % de IEEE 519-2022, posicionándola como alternativa de bajo costo para laboratorios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Buffalo ScienceSame topicLivestock Management and Performance ImprovementFrench-language works237,207