MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140806992 · doi:10.1109/icsmc.2007.4414103

Inductive transfer applied to stream discharge modeling

2007· article· en· W2140806992 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrological Forecasting Using AI
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSTREAMSTransfer functionTransfer (computing)Data modelingNova scotiaComputer scienceFlood mythArtificial neural networkTransfer of learningStreamflowDischargeEnvironmental scienceMachine learningEngineeringDatabaseGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artificial neural networks and inductive transfer are used to develop models that predict the discharge (flow rate) of fresh water streams in Nova Scotia from weather data. The objective is to show that transfer can be used to reduce the time and cost associated with collecting large amounts of the data for environmental modeling. The models use two days of weather data to predict the discharge for the following day. The models can be applied to land use, water management and flood predictions for sections of streams where continuous monitoring is not feasible. Models developed using only 180 days of training data with transfer from related streams perform as well on independent test data as models constructed using five years of training data and no transfer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.275
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrological Forecasting Using AIFrench-language works237,207