MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141019968 · doi:10.1109/lsp.2013.2285284

LED Backlight Adjustment for Backward-Compatible Stereoscopic Display

2013· article· en· W2141019968 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Letters · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Imaging Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBacklightStereoscopyLiquid-crystal displayComputer scienceComputer visionImage qualityArtificial intelligenceSIGNAL (programming language)Display deviceStereo displayModulation (music)Computer graphics (images)Image (mathematics)AcousticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It was recently shown that a high-speed optoelectronic display, via a novel signal processing technique called temporal psychovisual modulation (TPVM), can exhibit stereoscopic images to viewers wearing 3-D glasses and clean 2-D images to those without glasses all at the same time. This research aims to improve the above backward-compatible stereoscopy method by adjusting the backlight of today's common LED-lit liquid crystal display systems. Visual quality of the system can be enhanced by jointly optimizing the backlight intensity and the image signal at a negligible extra computational cost. For real-time applications of low-cost consumer electronics, this work also provides a low-complexity solution of backward-compatible stereoscopic display, in which highest 3-D quality is ensured with a small compromise of the 2-D quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it