MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141049965 · doi:10.1109/cca.1997.627533

Dynamics of a dual-unit articulated vehicle for path tracking control problem formulation

2002· article· en· W2141049965 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDual (grammatical number)Vehicle dynamicsPath (computing)Computer scienceUnit (ring theory)Control (management)Tracking (education)Computer visionArtificial intelligenceControl theory (sociology)EngineeringMathematicsAerospace engineeringArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dynamics of motion of a class of vehicles consisting of two one-axle wheeled units pivoted together are developed for the formulation of the path tracking control problem. This particular type of vehicle is frequently used for ore transportation in underground mines. Steering of this vehicle is performed through changing the angle between the two units by means of an actuator. In this paper the equations governing the motion and the tracking error dynamics in terms of the system inputs, namely the traction forces on the front and rear wheels and the actuator force for changing the angle between the two units, are derived. These equations are nonlinear and highly coupled. However, it may be deduced that from what normally appears in practice and for low operational speeds some acceptable assumptions may be made based upon which the formulation of the control problem and the synthesis of a controller becomes much simpler.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.640
Threshold uncertainty score0.438

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicControl and Dynamics of Mobile RobotsFrench-language works237,207