MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141163384 · doi:10.1109/iros.2009.5353968

Coordination control of a free-flying manipulator and its base attitude to capture and detumble a noncooperative satellite

2009· article· en· W2141163384 on OpenAlexaff
Farhad Aghili

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpace Satellite Systems and Control
Canadian institutionsCanadian Space Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSatelliteAttitude controlBase (topology)Control (management)Real-time computingAerospace engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on the guidance of a robot manipulator to capture a tumbling satellite and then bring it to state of rest (detumbling). First, a coordination control for combined system of the space robot and the target satellite, which acts as the manipulator payload, is presented so that the robot tracks the optimal path while regulating the attitude of the chase vehicle to a desired value. Subsequently, two optimal trajectories for the pre- and post-capture phases are designed. In the pre-capturing phase, the manipulator maneuvers are optimized by minimizing a cost function which includes the time of travel and the weighted norms of the end-effector velocity and acceleration, subject to the constraint that the robot end-effector and a grapple fixture on the satellite arrive at the rendezvous point with the same velocity. In the post-grasping phase, the manipulator dumps the initial velocity of the tumbling satellite in minimum time subject to the constraint that the magnitude of the torque applied to the satellite remains below a safe value. Simulation and experimental results are appended.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations79
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpace Satellite Systems and ControlFrench-language works237,207