MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141474097 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2008.4541818

Prediction of protein-coding regions in DNA sequences using a model-based approach

2008· article· en· W2141474097 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicFractal and DNA sequence analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExonCoding regionIntronComputer scienceAlgorithmCoding (social sciences)Computational biologyDNA sequencingPattern recognition (psychology)DNAArtificial intelligenceMathematicsGeneticsGeneBiologyStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prediction of the protein-coding regions (exons) is one of the central issues of DNA sequence analysis. Most of the existing computational methods exploit the period-3 property of the coding-regions to distinguish exons from noncoding regions (introns). However, the current Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) based methods are inadequate in predicting short exons. In this paper, we present a model-based exon detection approach using statistically optimal null filter. The proposed method employs a model of the period-3 characteristic to maximize signal-to-noise ratio, and least-squares optimization criteria to rapidly detect the presence of exons in the input DNA sequence. Through examples, it is shown that the proposed method is highly effective as compared to the DFT technique, especially in identifying short exons and successive exons separated by short introns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.414
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFractal and DNA sequence analysisFrench-language works237,207