MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142016329

The Evolution of a Health Information Brokering Service in the Province of British Columbia

2003· article· en· W2142016329 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronicHealthcare · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMedical Research and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkflowAgency (philosophy)BusinessHealth careHealth information exchangeInformation systemService (business)PopulationCancer registryMedicinePublic relationsPolitical scienceEnvironmental healthHealth informationComputer scienceMarketingDatabaseSociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ElectronicHealthcare Vol.2 No.2>2003 The Provincial Health Services Authority (PHSA) is implementing a health information brokering service in the province of British Columbia. This brokering service (called the Clinical Broker) is based upon the experienced gained by the B.C. Cancer Agency (BCCA) in the creation of its Electronic Health Record (EHR) for cancer care. The brokering service will initially focus on an operational need for information exchange between healthcare providers. Over time, it will be extended to include more complex healthcare services, such as results query, appointment booking and clinical decision support. Given the results achieved at the BCCA, the brokering service is expected to more than pay for itself in operational savings. It will also result in improved care and reduced clinical risk by accelerating the delivery of clinical information. As a byproduct, a unique data resource for the development of a provincial EHR is being created at no additional cost. Extensive experience is also being gained on the development of interfaces to clinical information systems, clinical information workflow, and on the value of data standards for clinical information exchange. This paper will examine the circumstances leading to the development of the Clinical Broker, and the opportunities that it will create in British Columbia. The story begins at the BCCA. THE B.C. CANCER AGENCY AND THE CANCER AGENCY INFORMATION SYSTEM The BCCA operates a cancer care program for the population of British Columbia. The management of information on cancer patients begins with the B.C. Cancer Registry, where, by law, all patients with a positive pathology of cancer must be registered. Approximately 60% of these patients will eventually be referred to the BCCA for treatment. Within the BCCA, care is primarily delivered through four comprehensive cancer centres, where the patients are primarily seen as outpatients. Information on all cancer patients in the province is maintained in the Cancer Agency chart. As with other types of chronic disease, the chart is longitudinal rather than encounterbased. More than 60% of the pages in a cancer chart originate from outside the BCCA. Information is gathered and retained from diagnosis to death, and sometimes beyond, for research. The BCCA currently has more than 450,000 charts, of which more than 100,000 are active. These paper-based charts represent a very significant information management challenge. In the fall of 1992, the BCCA began planning to build a new cancer treatment facility in the Fraser Valley. The existing information systems were dated and not capable of expanding to include the new centre. The market was examined for vendor solutions, but none were found . Electronic Health Records

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.566
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it