MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142050927 · doi:10.4171/dm/363

Basic polynomial invariants, fundamental representations and the Chern class map

2012· article· en· W2142050927 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueDocumenta Mathematica · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Algebra and Geometry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsClass (philosophy)Pure mathematicsChern classPolynomialAlgebra over a fieldBracket polynomialMatrix polynomialMathematical analysisSquare-free polynomialArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consider a crystallographic root system together with its Weyl group W acting on the weight lattice \Lambda . Let \mathbb Z[\Lambda]^W and S(\Lambda)^W be the W -invariant subrings of the integral group ring \mathbb Z[\Lambda] and the symmetric algebra S(\Lambda) respectively. A celebrated result by Chevalley says that \mathbb Z[\Lambda]^W is a polynomial ring in classes of fundamental representations \rho_1,...,\rho_n and S(\Lambda)^W\otimes{Q} is a polynomial ring in basic polynomial invariants q_1,...,q_n . In the present paper we establish and investigate the relationship between \rho_i 's and q_i 's over the integers. As an application we provide estimates for the torsion of the Grothendieck \gamma -filtration and the Chow groups of some twisted flag varieties up to codimension 4.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it